设为首页| 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 联系我们 下载专区
最新消息:
位置:首页 >> 期刊文章
MELD评分联合降钙素原对慢加急性肝功能衰竭患者近期预后的预测价值
作者:农桂东1   陈月桥 2   梁潇月 2   凌春萍 2  
单位:1. 广西田东县中医院 肝病科 广西 田东 531500 2. 广西中医药大学第一附属医院 肝病科 广西 南宁 530023 
关键词:MELD评分 降钙素原 肝功能衰竭 慢加急性 
分类号:
出版年,卷(期):页码:2016,8(1):53-56
摘要:

摘要:目的 观察慢加急性肝功能衰竭(acute-on-chronic liver failure,ACLF)患者MELD评分模型
(model for end-stage liver disease,MELD)和降钙素原(proprocalcitonin,PCT)的变化,评价
MELD评分联合PCT对判断ACLF患者近期预后的价值。方法 选择2012年6月至2015年3月广西中医
药大学第一附属医院肝病治疗中心及广西田东县中医院肝病科ACLF住院患者83例,分为生存组43例
和死亡组40例,比较两组患者的TBil、Cr、INR、MELD评分和PCT等的变化。结果 ①治疗12周结束
时,全部83例ACLF患者中共病死40例,总病死率49.43%。②治疗前比较 2组TBil、Cr、INR、MELD
评分和PCT,差异无统计学意义(t = 0.594、0.644、0.215、1.326、0.053;P = 0.554、0.522、0.830、
0.188、0.958);治疗第2周后两组间比较,TBil、INR差异无统计学意义(t = 0.994、1.160,P =
0.324、0.250),Cr、PCT、MELD评分差异有统计学意义(t = 2.779、18.400、4.948,P = 0.007、
0.000、0.000)。治疗第4周后两组间比较,TBil、Cr、INR、PCT、MELD评分差异有统计学意义(t =
5.346、3.951、3.571、15.995、8.085,P = 0.000)。③MELD评分联合PCT判断ACLF 12周内病死的
AUC为0.751,高于单纯MELD评分的AUC 0.722和PCT的AUC 0.684。结论 MELD评分联合降钙素原
对ACLF患者近期预后预测效果良好。

Abstract: Objective To observe the changes of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores and
proprocalcitonin(PCT) of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF), and to evaluate the predictive
value of MELD combined with PCT on the short-term prognosis in patients with ACLF. Methods Total
of 83 patients with ACLF in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine
and Tiandong Chinese Medicine Hospital from June 2012 to March 2015 were selected and divided
into survival group (43 cases) and death group (40 cases), the changes of biochemical indexes, MELD
score and PCT in the two groups were compared. Results ①Total of 40 patients died in all 83 patients with
ACLF at the end of the 12 weeks, the total mortality rate was 49.43%. ②There were no significant differences
of all indexes between two groups before treatment (t = 0.594, 0.644, 0.215, 1.326, 0.053; P = 0.554, 0.522,
0.830, 0.188, 0.958). The difference in TBil and INR had no statistical significance (t = 0.994, 1.160; P =
0.324, 0.250), but the difference in Cr, PCT and MELD scores had statistical significance (t = 0.745, P =
0.000) between survival group and death group after two weeks. The differences of TBil, Cr, INR, PCT and
MELD scores were statistically significant between the two groups after 4 weeks (t = 5.346, 3.951, 3.571,
15.995, 8.085; P = 0.000). ③The AUC of MELD score combined with PCT was 0.751, which was higher than 0.722 only by MELD score and 0.684 by PCT within 12 weeks for patients with ACLF. Conclusion MELD
score combined with PCT has a good predictive value on the short-term prognosis in patients with ACLF.

 

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
 

地址:北京市朝阳区京顺东街8号
邮政编码:100015  电话:010-84322058  传真:010-84322059 Email:editordt@163.com